ArticleHealth services & outcomes research methodology2024
The challenges of integrating diverse data sources: A case study in major depression.
Article in Health services & outcomes research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05267873 (Combining Data Sources to Identify Effect Moderation for Personalized Mental Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Combining Data Sources to Identify Effect Moderation for Personalized Mental Health
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative effectiveness of antidepressants for depression using EHRs from two health systems.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Rise of Generalist Foundation Models and Quantum Computing in Oncology.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Combining data from diverse sources including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational datasets holds the potential to increase sample size, improve external validity, and gain a well-rounded view of the question under study. However, the practical implementation of integrating different data sources can be complicated, particularly when considering data collected across sites and institutions. In this paper, we use a case study of data from four RCTs and two electronic health record (EHR) systems to illustrate some of the challenges that can arise when combining these various sources of data. We group the challenges into cohort- and variable-related challenges, and for each challenge, we provide descriptive statistics and visuals from our case study to show the decisions that must be made and the subsequent implications. We provide guidance for researchers on the most important considerations and emphasize the necessity for careful, documented decision-making done through an interdisciplinary team. Through this case study and associated reflections, we highlight the dangers of naively combining data and advocate for a discussion and clear communication of the decisions made at each step in the data combination process, as well as the limitations and implications of those decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.