ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
The impact of radioligand therapy on prognosis in patients with lung neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence on the efficacy and safety of radioligand therapy (RLT) in lung neuroendocrine tumors (LNETs) remains scarce. The limited data available, derived mainly from retrospective analyses are based on small patient cohorts and heterogeneous treatment protocols. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of RLT in patients with SSTR-positive LNETs treated with either [¹ Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 22 LNET patients who received RLT and had complete follow-up data. Treatment response and survival outcomes were evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic associations with PFS and OS were explored using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, treatment-related AE were graded according to CTCAE. Results: A total of 22 patients with LNETs (Med. 61 years; 68.2% male) were included. Histology comprised 31.8% typical carcinoid, 54.5% atypical carcinoid, and 13.6% LNET G3. 14 patients received [¹ Conclusions: RLT demonstrated signals of clinically meaningful activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced LNETs in this small retrospective cohort. Outcomes were numerically more favorable in individuals with high SSTR uptake and in those treated with tandem therapy, but the study was not designed to compare treatment regimens. These exploratory findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating only and do not provide evidence of comparative efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.