ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Experience of using anti-CD 20 therapies in multiple sclerosis patients in Kenya.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab (OCR) and rituximab (RTX) in multiple sclerosis. Methods: This was a retrospective single-centre study. Ocrelizumab- and rituximab-treated patients were identified through the multiple sclerosis (MS) registry maintained at Aga Khan University Hospital Nairobi (AKUHN), Kenya. Adult patients aged 18-65 years old who fulfilled the McDonald 2017 diagnosis criteria and received treatment with either rituximab or ocrelizumab between January 2016 and June 2025 were retrospectively evaluated. Data collected at baseline included age, gender, first symptoms, disease duration since onset, MS phenotype, treatment duration, previous therapies, reasons for switching to anti-CD 20 (cluster of differentiation) therapy, date of start of anti-CD 20 therapy, and adverse events. Disease activity was evaluated both clinically and through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: A total of 67 patients (male:female, 14:53) received anti-CD 20 therapy, with the majority having relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) (5277.6%), while the rest had progressive MS. Patients were treated with either ocrelizumab 600 mg or rituximab 1,000 mg administered intravenously (IV) every 6 months. After 1 year, the cumulative relapse rate dropped, with the number of patients having clinical relapse events reduced from 48 to 7. Overall, 40 patients had stable MRI findings, 7 had new MRI lesions, and 20 did not have follow-up scans. No infusion-related adverse events or life-threatening infections were reported with the administration of anti-CD 20 therapy, and no case of malignancy or progressive multifocal encephalopathy was detected. Conclusion: This retrospective, single-centre study provides real-world data on B-cell-depleting therapies in an African MS cohort. Ocrelizumab and rituximab appear to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective therapeutic options for people living with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.