ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Preliminary study on ultrasound-based quantitative assessment of epiphyseal ossification angle for bone age evaluation in children.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone age (BA) assessment is crucial for evaluating pediatric growth, yet the standard radiographic method involves ionizing radiation. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a novel, quantitative ultrasound parameter-the epiphyseal ossification angle (OA)-as a non-invasive alternative for BA evaluation, and to examine its correlation with radiographically determined BA. Methods: In this prospective study, 201 Chinese Han girls aged 5-14 years (mean age: 9.24±2.15 years) underwent both left wrist radiography and ultrasonography of the distal radius, distal ulna, and medial femoral condyle within a 1-week interval. The OA and the established ossification ratio (OR) were measured at each site. Composite indices-the total ossification angle (TOA, sum of OAs) and skeletal maturity score (SMS, sum of ORs)-were calculated. Radiographic BA was determined by the Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3) method as the reference standard. Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and correlations were analyzed with Pearson's method. Results: Both OA and OR measurements demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-observer reproducibility, with ICCs ranging from 0.81 to 0.92 and 0.78 to 0.89, respectively (all P<0.001). OA at all individual sites showed significant negative correlations with TW3 BA (radius: r=-0.686; ulna: r=-0.650; femur: r=-0.721; all P<0.001). The composite TOA demonstrated a strong inverse correlation with BA (r=-0.808, P<0.001). Similarly, OR was positively correlated with BA at all sites (radius: r=0.807; ulna: r=0.632; femur: r=0.708; all P<0.001), with SMS showing the strongest positive correlation (r=0.813, P<0.001). A linear regression model based on TOA explained 65.3% of the variance in BA (R Conclusions: The ultrasound-derived OA demonstrates a strong inverse correlation with radiographic BA. The composite TOA shows particular promise as a novel, non-invasive marker for pediatric BA assessment. These findings support the feasibility of the OA as a quantitative ultrasound parameter and warrant further investigation to develop and validate clinical prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.