Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669421›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Preliminary quantitative and qualitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in normal proliferative endometrium of infertile patients.

Xiaofang Hong, Siyu Liang, Shuyue Zhang, Yujuan Hu, Xiaolin Zeng, Jiali He, Weixiang Liang, Tao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaofang Hong *Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Siyu Liang *Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuyue ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yujuan HuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaolin ZengDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiali HeDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weixiang LiangDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao LiuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies have suggested that assessing endometrial and subendometrial blood flow can contribute to the evaluation of endometrial receptivity. However, there remains a lack of unified expert consensus regarding the assessment of regional endometrial blood supply, and no established reference values are currently available for guidance. Using endometrial pathological biopsy as the gold standard, this study aims to characterize contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) imaging features and establish reference ranges for quantitative parameters in the endometrium, subendometrial region, and myometrium during the normal proliferative phase in infertile patients, thereby providing reliable data to support the evaluation of endometrial receptivity. Methods: Infertile patients scheduled to undergo hysteroscopy and endometrial pathological biopsy at our hospital between April 2023 and July 2024 were enrolled. Relevant patient information was collected. All patients underwent CEUS examination prior to surgery, with pathological biopsy serving as the gold standard. The imaging features, qualitative indices, and reference ranges for the quantitative parameters of CEUS in the endometrium, subendometrium, and myometrium of patients with a normal proliferative endometrium were analyzed. Results: Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 40 infertile patients with normal proliferative endometrium were included in the study. The average thickness of the normal proliferative endometrium was 5.84±2.23 mm. The endometrial type was predominantly type B (29/39), and subendometrial blood flow was primarily type III (12/25). CEUS of the endometrial region was characterized mainly by uniform low enhancement (22/40) and uniform isointensity (14/40), with clear demarcation between the myometrium and subendometrium. The time-intensity curve (TIC) morphology was similar across the endometrial region, subendometrial region, and myometrium. The peak intensity (Pi) of the endometrial region was 16.19±4.28 dB, the ascending branch slope (K) was 0.24±0.09, the area under the curve (AUC) was 1,257.95±301.83 dB, and the time to peak (TtoPK) was 18.29±4.75 s. Good consistency was observed between different regions of interest (ROIs) measurements (10 mm × 1 mm Conclusions: CEUS of the normal proliferative endometrium in infertile patients mainly demonstrated homogeneous enhancement, predominantly low enhancement and isointensity, with clear boundaries between the subendometrium and myometrium, and distinct TIC characteristics. CEUS technology effectively displays the blood perfusion in the endometrium, subendometrium, and myometrium, with high sensitivity. This study provides reference ranges for the quantitative parameters of CEUS in the normal proliferative endometrium of infertility patients.

Indexed as

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS)endometrial regionmicrovascular perfusionsubendometrial regiontime-intensity curve (TIC)

Identifiers

PMID41669421
PMCPMC12883466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.