ArticleBrazilian journal of veterinary medicine2026
Preclinical study of gasless laparoscopy for radical nephrectomies in canine cadavers.
Article in Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to verify the feasibility of the multidirectional traction platform in performing gasless laparoscopic nephrectomies on dog cadavers. The cadavers were divided into two groups: those subjected to gasless laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (GCG) and those subjected to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with pneumoperitoneum (GCP). The total surgical time, time for each stage of the procedure, and intraoperative complications were recorded. Using the Likert scale and visual analog scale (VAS), the surgeon and assistant assessed the degree of difficulty of each surgical approach. The total surgical time for nephrectomy was longer in the GCG group (p<0.01). Similarly, differences in the steps of positioning portal 2, establishing the abdominal elevation equipment, dissecting the vessels of the renal hilum, and dissecting the kidney from the fascia renal disease were also longer in the GCG group (p<0.05). A significant interaction was observed between the surgical group and the side of surgery, and the variable time to remove the kidney from the abdominal cavity (p=0.02) was longer in the GCG group. In the evaluation of the surgeon and assistant, the groups differed in all parameters, indicating the degree of difficulty of surgical approaches on a Likert scale (p<0.05). On the VAS scale, we observed a higher response in the GCG group (p<0.01). The multidirectional abdominal traction device used in this study enabled the performance of gasless laparoscopic radical nephrectomies on dog cadavers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.