Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669381›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

A machine learning and remote sensing approach for accurate forest sub-compartment level vegetation cover change monitoring.

Wenjie Zhang, Yingze Tian, Xiaohui Su, Danzi Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenjie ZhangSchool of Information Science & Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Yingze TianSichuan Forestry and Grassland Survey and Planning Institute, Chengdu, China.
Xiaohui SuSchool of Information Science & Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Danzi WuSchool of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate detection of vegetation cover type changes in forest sub-compartments (FSCs) is essential for supporting informed forest management decisions. Although various forest change detection algorithms have been developed, fine-scaledetection at the FSC level has received limited attention. Methods: This study addresses this gap by developing an FSC-scale vegetation cover type change detection method that couples spectral and texture information from Sentinel-2 multispectral imagery with forest management planning and design investigation (FMPI) data. Original spectral bands, vegetation indices, and texture features were extracted and used to construct a classification model based on a particle swarm optimization-back propagation neural network (PSO-BPNN). To evaluate performance, the proposed PSO-BPNN method was compared with random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and conventional back-propagation neural network (BPNN) models. Results: Results indicate that PSO-BPNN consistently outperformed the other algorithms in change detection at the FSC scale. Specifically, the method achieved an overall accuracy of 91% for change identification, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.86. In the validation dataset, it successfully detected approximately 80% of the changed FSCs. Discussion: The proposed approach offers a robust and accurate solution for fine-scale forest change monitoring, it enhances the scientific basis for sustainable forest resource management.

Indexed as

change detectionforest sub-compartment (FSC)machine learningremote sensing imagetexture feature

Identifiers

PMID41669381
PMCPMC12883800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.