ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026
The AENEAS Project: Intraoperative Anatomical Guidance Through Real-Time Landmark Detection Using Machine Vision.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the performance of a deep learning machine vision-based model in identifying anatomical landmarks in a complex microsurgical setting, such as the pterional trans-Sylvian approach. Patients and Methods: We developed a deep learning object detection model (YOLOv7x) trained on 5307 labeled frames from 78 surgical videos of 76 patients undergoing pterional trans-Sylvian approach from January 1, 2020 to June 31, 2024. Surgical steps were standardized, and key anatomical targets-frontal/temporal dura, inferior frontal/superior temporal gyri, optic and olfactory nerves, and internal carotid artery-were annotated by specifically trained neurosurgical residents and verified by the operating surgeon. Bounding boxes derived from segmentation masks served as training inputs. Performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Results: The model achieved promising detection performance for deep structures, particularly the optic nerve (average precision at an intersection over union threshold of 0.50 [AP Conclusion: Applying machine vision techniques for anatomical detection in a complex neurosurgical setting is feasible. Although challenges remain in detecting less distinctive structures, the high accuracy achieved for deep anatomical landmarks validates this approach. This study marks an essential step toward the development of machine vision-powered anatomical recognition tools, with the prospective goal of improving intraoperative orientation and reducing variability among surgeons.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.