Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669377›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026

The AENEAS Project: Intraoperative Anatomical Guidance Through Real-Time Landmark Detection Using Machine Vision.

Simone Olei, Gary Sarwin, Victor E Staartjes, Luca Zanuttini, Seungjun Ryu, Luca Regli, Ender Konukoglu, Carlo Serra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simone OleiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, University Hospital Zürich, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gary SarwinComputer Vision Lab (CVL), ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Victor E StaartjesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, University Hospital Zürich, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Luca ZanuttiniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Seungjun RyuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Daejeon Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University Medical School, Daejeon, South Korea.
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, University Hospital Zürich, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ender KonukogluComputer Vision Lab (CVL), ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Carlo SerraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, University Hospital Zürich, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the performance of a deep learning machine vision-based model in identifying anatomical landmarks in a complex microsurgical setting, such as the pterional trans-Sylvian approach. Patients and Methods: We developed a deep learning object detection model (YOLOv7x) trained on 5307 labeled frames from 78 surgical videos of 76 patients undergoing pterional trans-Sylvian approach from January 1, 2020 to June 31, 2024. Surgical steps were standardized, and key anatomical targets-frontal/temporal dura, inferior frontal/superior temporal gyri, optic and olfactory nerves, and internal carotid artery-were annotated by specifically trained neurosurgical residents and verified by the operating surgeon. Bounding boxes derived from segmentation masks served as training inputs. Performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Results: The model achieved promising detection performance for deep structures, particularly the optic nerve (average precision at an intersection over union threshold of 0.50 [AP Conclusion: Applying machine vision techniques for anatomical detection in a complex neurosurgical setting is feasible. Although challenges remain in detecting less distinctive structures, the high accuracy achieved for deep anatomical landmarks validates this approach. This study marks an essential step toward the development of machine vision-powered anatomical recognition tools, with the prospective goal of improving intraoperative orientation and reducing variability among surgeons.

Identifiers

PMID41669377
PMCPMC12885630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.