ArticleBMC methods2026
Road map for primary hepatocyte qualification in human liver organ models.
Article in BMC methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatocyte Models for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Non-HepG2 Cell Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Microphysiological systems (MPS) are powerful tools for modeling human organ function and evaluating therapeutic interventions. The performance and translational relevance of MPS are highly dependent on the quality and suitability of the cells used. Given the expanding array of primary and stem cell-derived sources, there is a critical need for systematic frameworks to guide cell selection, particularly for disease-specific applications such as Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD). Methods: We developed a phased, stepwise methodology to evaluate and select primary human hepatocytes for use in a liver MPS model of MASLD. The protocol incorporates assessments of cell source quality, plating efficiency, viability, baseline liver function, and responsiveness to disease-inducing conditions. Quantitative metrics and pass/fail criteria were applied at each stage to ensure consistent and reproducible evaluation across cell lots. Results: Application of the protocol enabled effective triaging of hepatocyte sources, distinguishing cell lots with superior plating performance and functional profiles. Selected hepatocytes exhibited robust expression of liver-specific markers, maintained metabolic activity, and demonstrated disease-relevant phenotypes under MASLD-inducing conditions. Discussion: This structured evaluation framework facilitates the identification of high-quality hepatocytes for MPS liver models, improving reproducibility and disease modeling accuracy. While this protocol was tailored for MASLD, the approach is adaptable to other liver diseases or applications. Limitations include potential variability in donor tissue availability and the need for standardization across laboratories. Clinical trial number: Not applicable. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44330-026-00058-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.