ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
ICCTUS score - Inspiration, Circulation and Consciousness predicting the Threat for an Unfavorable Outcome after SAH.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We previously developed a novel score derived from the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and demonstrated its ability to predict delayed cerebral ischemia-associated infarctions following spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. In the current study, we investigated whether the new score (ICCTUS score) can predict neurological outcome. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all SAH patients in our neurosurgical ICU during a 10-year period. Patients were included if clinical data were available to determine SOFA and ICCTUS scores. Outcome was objectified by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 6 months. Every parameter of the SOFA score was graded for its predictive value and combinations were tested using ROC analysis. Results: 430 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (68.14% female, mean age: 56.8 ± 12.5 years). Median SOFA and ICCTUS scores were 5. The SOFA score had an AUC of 0.76 for prediction of unfavorable outcome. In comparison, the WFNS achieved an AUC of 0.71, and the HH an AUC of 0.64. For the ICCTUS score, which is based exclusively on the subscores rating the central nervous system, the cardiovascular system, and the respiratory system the AUC was at 0.8 with a sensitivity of 0.74, a specificity of 0.74, a PPV of 0.83 and a NPV of 0.62. The Youden index was 0.48 (cut-off ≥3 points). Conclusion: The ICCTUS score was at least equal or superior to the established scores in predicting unfavorable outcome after SAH. The score could be implemented as an additional tool in multimodal diagnostics to identify patients at high risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.