Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669323›Full record

ReviewTzu chi medical journal

Cell culture platform fabrication methods and applications.

Yao-Nan Wang, Ko-Tung Chang, Jui-Kai Liu, Chang-Hsien Tai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yao-Nan WangDepartment of Vehicle Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Ko-Tung ChangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Jui-Kai LiuGeneral Research Service Center, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Chang-Hsien TaiMaster Program in Sustainability and Disaster Management, Tzu Chi University, Hualian, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell culture technologies are fundamental tool in biological research. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) cell culture methods, despite their widespread use and simplicity, fail to accurately replicate the physiological conditions of native tissues, leading to altered cellular behavior. Recent advancements in 3D culture techniques, combined with innovative fabrication methods such as photolithography, paper-based, and 3D printing, have substantially improved the fidelity of cell culture models. In parallel, numerical simulations have become indispensable for optimizing the design and performance of these systems, offering precise control microenvironmental factors such as fluid dynamics, nutrient and oxygen gradients, and shear stress within microfluidic platforms. These approaches for integration facilitate accurate modeling of cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interactions essential for physiological relation. Concurrently, the integration of multimaterial fabrication techniques provides scalable and customizable solutions for developing sophisticated microfluidic and cell culture systems. This review discusses recent developments in these fabrication methods and highlights their integration with numerical simulation for optimization design, explores their collective potential to advance biomedical research and applications.

Indexed as

Cell cultureLithographyNumerical simulationPaper-basedThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID41669323
PMCPMC12885461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.