ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2025
Investigating the Performance of X-ray Protection of Various Elements and Alloy Compounds in Aprons for Interventional Radiology.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In X-ray imaging with fluoroscopy/angiography modalities, long exposure time may cause a high received dose by the physician due to the scattered photons from the patient and device. Using lead aprons significantly decreases the physician dose, but long-term disadvantages to health that are found with using this high-weight and toxic material make it interests to find alternatives. This study attempts to compare the radiation protection of different shields based on the effective physician organ doses to find the most effective radioprotection materials for each body site. Materials and Methods: Investigations on the protective efficiency of the aprons with different material compositions were performed using MCNPX Monte Carlo code to simulate the models as close as possible to a real imaging room and anthropomorphic phantoms. Results: According to the results, tungsten and its multilayer composites containing gadolinium and bismuth demonstrated the highest level of protection for all physician organs across the primary beam energy range of 80-120 kVp. Among them, the greatest reductions of radiation transmission were observed for Gd-W and Gd-W-Bi multilayers, respectively. These both were also the most effective shields for 70 kVp in lower organs but not more than Sb-W and Sn-W bilayers for upper and middle organs. Conclusion: A selection based on the used energy can be there between these four compositions due to their higher protection produced by aprons with lower thickness and lower final weight, but the same efficiency as lead garments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.