ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Residual-SwishNet: a deep learning-based approach for reliable lung cancer classification.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer remains one of the primary causes of cancer-related deaths globally, emphasizing the urgent need for accurate and early diagnosis to improve patient outcomes. However, existing computer-aided detection systems often struggle with suboptimal feature extraction, low classification accuracy, and limited generalizability across datasets. Methods: To address these challenges, we propose a deep learning approach named Residual-SwishNet, explicitly designed for the lung cancer classification task. More specifically, we modified the ResNet50 framework by replacing the conventional ReLU activation function with Swish during the feature engineering phase. Further, we integrate three additional dense layers before the classification module to obtain an enriched feature representation. Lastly, we employ a Softmax output layer with Cross-Entropy Loss to tackle the class-imbalance issue. Results: The approach was rigorously evaluated on 2 publicly accessible datasets, named LUNA16 and IQOTH/NCCD, using precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy as performance metrics. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our technique, achieving classification accuracies of 99.60% and 99.11% on the LUNA16 and IQ-OTH/NCCD datasets. Discussion: Our approach has significantly outperformed existing state-of-the-art techniques. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed model as a robust and reliable tool for lung cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.