ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Clinical utility of anthropometric parameters in identifying glucose dysregulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: Clinical utility of anthropometric parameters in identifying glucose dysregulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder often associated with disturbances in glucose metabolism and insulin resistance (IR), increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Standard assessment of glucose dysregulations and IR requires laboratory tests, but simple anthropometric indices, including BMI, WHtR, WHR, VAI, LAP, BAI, BRI and ABSI, may provide non-invasive tools for early risk screening. Their predictive value and optimal cut-off points for detecting glucose dysregulation and IR in PCOS remain unclear. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of anthropometric indices in identifying glucose dysregulation in women with PCOS, and to provide prognostic insight with potential cut-off points for these indices. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 49 women with PCOS according to Rotterdam criteria. Anthropometric measurements (BMI, WC, WHR, WHtR, VAI, BAI, LAP, BRI, ABSI) and fasting biochemical parameters (glucose, insulin) were collected. Correlations between indices and carbohydrate disturbances were assessed using Pearson or Spearman coefficients. The predictive ability of anthropometric indices for glucose dysregulations and IR were evaluated using ROC curve analysis, including AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and optimal cut-off points, while logistic regression quantified the strength of associations. Results: BMI, WHtR, BAI, VAI, LAP, and BRI were significantly correlated with fasting glucose and insulin levels, indicating a strong link between adiposity and IR in women with PCOS. Among these indices, VAI showed the highest predictive performance for elevated HOMA-IR (AUC = 0.933, cut-off point 0.99; sensitivity 85.7, specificity 90.5%), followed by LAP (AUC = 0.883, cut-off point 27.9) and BMI (AUC = 0.852, cut off point 27 kg/m Conclusion: Anthropometric indices, particularly VAI, LAP, and BMI, reliably predicts glucose dysregulations and IR in women with PCOS. These simple, non-invasive measurements may serve as useful screening tools for early identifications of glucose dysregulation, aiding risk stratification and guiding further metabolic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.