ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Efficiency and determinants of science and technology investment in Chinese competitive sports: a provincial DEA-Tobit analysis.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The efficiency with which science and technology (S&T) investment is translated into competitive sports performance is a critical yet underexplored issue in China, despite the rapid growth of related funding in recent years. Methods: This study evaluates the efficiency of provincial S&T investment in competitive sports across 31 Chinese provinces from 2018 to 2022. Using a two-stage analytical framework grounded in the Resource-Based View, we integrate Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), the Malmquist productivity index, and Tobit regression to assess static efficiency, dynamic productivity changes, and their key influencing factors. Results: The results indicate that the overall efficiency of S&T investment in China's competitive sports system remains relatively low, with pronounced regional disparities. Dynamic analysis reveals that total factor productivity declined on average, primarily due to limited technological progress rather than changes in technical efficiency. Tobit regression results show that research staff input and the emphasis on technological R&D are negatively associated with efficiency, while regional economic development improves pure technical efficiency but undermines scale efficiency. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the main constraint on the effectiveness of S&T investment lies not in the quantity of resources but in their strategic configuration and conversion into athletic outcomes. Policy efforts should therefore shift from expanding investment scale toward optimizing resource orchestration and strengthening the linkage between scientific research and training practice to enhance the overall efficiency and sustainability of competitive sports development in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.