ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2026
A Bibliometric Analysis of Complications in Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction: Two Decades of Insights.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, a cornerstone in modern orthopedics, aims to restore knee stability while minimizing complications. Bibliometric analysis provides insights into research trends, influential contributors, and advancements in this field. Materials and Methods: A systematic analysis of 104 eligible articles on ACL reconstruction complications was conducted using the Web of Science database. Data, including titles, authors, and journals, were extracted. Bibliometric insights were generated using R software, while VOS viewer visualized bibliographic coupling, co-authorship networks, and keyword co-occurrence through interactive mapping techniques. Results: Annual publications peaked in 2022, with the U.S. contributing 73 studies and fostering global collaborations. Conclusion: This 20-year bibliometric review underscores global research trends in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, with the U.S. leading in both publication volume and impact. Journals like Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-025-01543-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.