Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669188›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A quasi-experimental study: cultivating mathematical resilience via intervention in Chinese classrooms.

Xia Wang, Amalia Madihie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xia WangFaculty of Cognitive Science and Human Development, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia.
Amalia MadihieFaculty of Cognitive Science and Human Development, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluates the efficacy of a culturally adapted Chinese Resilience Intervention Module in enhancing mathematical resilience among university students, grounded in the Sidek resilience framework. Methods: Mathematical resilience was measured using the validated Chinese Mathematical Resilience Scale. The intervention underwent expert validation for cultural and pedagogical relevance. A quasi-experimental design compared outcomes between intervention and control groups, with a one-month retention test assessing sustainability. Results: Results demonstrated sustained improvements in resilience scores for the experimental group, persisting through follow-up assessments. Discussion: The findings support the intervention's potential for identifying at-risk learners and informing targeted support strategies in STEM education. Limitations include geographical specificity to Eastern China and short-term follow-up. This work advances interdisciplinary approaches to resilience-focused pedagogy, advocating for integrated teaching-assessment systems to mitigate mathematical learning barriers.

Indexed as

interventionmathematical resiliencemathematical resilience scalequasi-experimental studySidek module

Identifiers

PMID41669188
PMCPMC12883801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.