ArticleJAMIA open2026
Detecting momentary reward and affect with real-time passive digital sensor data.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incremental Value of Smartphone Sensing for Monitoring Momentary Affect Intensity in Adults Using Transformer-Based Models: Observational Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study explores the capability of passive digital sensor data from smartphones and smartwatches to predict self-reported ecological momentary assessments (EMA) of affect, motivation, interest, and pleasure in activities in an unseen test sample. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from 245 depressed participants with high-to-low anhedonia (195 train, 50 test) generating 23 812 EMA sessions. Machine learning models were used to assess the ability of behavioral and physiological features, aggregated over windows of 15 minutes to 3 hours, to predict momentary subjective states. Results: For 12 of 15 EMA questions asked, machine learning models exceeded random chance in the fully-held-out test sample, suggesting detectable signals between passive measures and subjective states. Dependent on the sensor type, the optimal aggregation periods ranged from 15 minutes to 3 hours, with generally at least two hours of data being required. Subgroup analyses revealed variations in model performance by demographics, depression severity, and anhedonia severity. Conclusion: This study establishes the feasibility of using passive digital sensing to detect momentary subjective states, providing a baseline for scalable, non-invasive mental health monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.