SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
A 2025 systematic review of teacher emotion regulation and well-being: implications for student engagement, learning outcomes, and professional development in EFL contexts.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an emotion regulation training intervention for primary education students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Teacher emotion regulation is increasingly recognized as a critical determinant of instructional quality, professional well-being, and student success, particularly in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts where linguistic challenges, sociocultural diversity, and high emotional labor intensify classroom demands. However, a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence linking these strategies to multi-level outcomes (teacher, student, and institutional) remains lacking. This systematic review synthesized findings from 165 peer-reviewed studies published between 1998 and 2025 to examine how emotion regulation strategies influence teacher well-being, professional development, and student engagement. Methods: Literature searches were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and guided by PICOS criteria to ensure transparency, comprehensiveness, and replicability. Searches were performed in Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and PsycINFO, supplemented by hand-searching reference lists. The included studies employed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method designs and were analyzed using a combination of thematic analysis and content analysis. Coding reliability was established through double-coding of 25% of the studies, yielding strong inter-rater agreement ( Results: Three major thematic patterns emerged. First, adaptive strategies, including cognitive reappraisal, mindfulness, attentional deployment, and relational regulation, were consistently associated with reduced stress, enhanced resilience, improved classroom management, and positive teacher-student interactions, whereas maladaptive strategies, such as suppression and rumination, predicted burnout and reduced instructional quality. A predominant finding across quantitative studies was a significant positive correlation between adaptive regulation and teacher self-efficacy. Second, professional development interventions-structured workshops, reflective journaling, and peer coaching-enhanced teachers' emotional competence, self-efficacy, and professional identity formation. Third, teacher emotion regulation significantly influenced student engagement, motivation, participation, classroom emotional climate, and language achievement. Cross-theme synthesis revealed cascading effects, showing that adaptive regulation promotes teacher well-being, which in turn supports student learning and professional development. Discussion: These findings underscore the importance of embedding emotion regulation training into teacher education programs, institutional policies, and reflective practice, establishing it not merely as a personal coping mechanism but as a foundational professional competency with direct implications for instructional quality and student outcomes. Future longitudinal and culturally contextualized research is needed to further elucidate these cascading mechanisms, ultimately informing more effective supports for teachers and learners in linguistically diverse classrooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.