Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669123›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2025

Management practices of primary postpartum hemorrhage among traditional birth attendants: a qualitative survey, Iganga, Uganda.

Sharon Namasambi, Kizito Omona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sharon NamasambiResearch Coordination Centre, Mildmay Uganda, Kampala.
Kizito OmonaFaculty of Health Sciences, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Postpartum hemorrhage is a significant barrier to the achievement of Sustainable development goal 3.1, given that it is associated with more than a quarter of all maternal mortality cases. Traditional birth attendants (TBAs), who are outlawed in many countries, including Uganda inclusive, attend to about 33% of all births globally. The objective of this study was to explore the management practices of primary postpartum hemorrhage among traditional birth attendants in Iganga district. Methods: The study used a case phenomenological qualitative exploratory design, targeting traditional birth attendants. Snowballing was used to select participants and engage them in-depth interviews. Data collected was analyzed thematically, with the induction approach. Results: It was found that TBAs carried out PPH assessment using three methods; quantification of blood lost using household cups, vital assessment and visual assessment. Visual assessment was the most dominant. Postpartum hemorrhage resuscitation practices mainly rotated around the use of warm water. They did not carry resuscitation. The treatment interventions used were: use of herbal medicine and referral of severe cases to hospital. Conclusion: TBAs in Iganga district visually assess postpartum hemorrhage but they do not conduct resuscitation procedures. They use herbal uterotonics in the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage alongside with referral to hospital.

Indexed as

MidwiferyPostpartum HemorrhageAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaternal MortalityPregnancyQualitative ResearchTraditional Medicine PractitionersUgandaManagement PracticesPostpartum hemorrhageSkilled Birth AttendantsTraditional Birth AttendantsUganda

Identifiers

PMID41669123
PMCPMC12883963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.