ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Simplified Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: A Cost-Effective Solution for Wound Management.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of shoelace technique versus conventional secondary suturing for delayed closure of limited fasciotomy wounds.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has emerged as a highly effective technique for managing chronic non-healing wounds. However, the high cost and limited accessibility of commercial NPWT systems restrict their routine use in resource-constrained settings. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an indigenously developed simplified negative pressure wound dressing (SNPWD) for wound management in a low-resource environment. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted on 24 patients with a mean wound size pre-SNPWD being 73.5cm2 in the Department of Orthopaedics at a tertiary care hospital. Final wound area, total duration of SNPWD application, number of dressing changes, and the exudate collection, along with culture report, were documented for outcome comparison with data from existing NPWT literature. Results: The decrease in mean wound surface area after SNPWD application in our study was 27.2%. The mean duration of SNPWD application, that is, the time taken for development of healthy granulation tissue, ranged from 8 to 27 days, the mean duration being 16.5 days. The mean number of dressings applied per patient was 5.3. The mean amount of exudates collected in the canister decreased by 58% as compared to pre-SNPWD. The post-SNWPD culture report of wounds was sterile in 96% of cases, as compared to only 37.5% sterile culture reports before applying SNPWD. Conclusion: The SNPWD is a safe, effective, and cost-efficient alternative to commercial NPWT systems. With comparable clinical outcomes and significantly lower cost, SNPWD holds strong potential for widespread use in managing complex wounds, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.