Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669019›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026

Humerus Non-union with Segmental Bone Loss Treated with 3D-printed Prosthesis: A Case Report.

Sujit Jos, Rahul Chandran, Prannoy Paul, Kiran Benny, Midhun Jose

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sujit JosDepartment of Orthopedics, MOSC Medical College Hospital, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
Rahul ChandranDepartment of Orthopedics, MOSC Medical College Hospital, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
Prannoy PaulDepartment of Orthopedics, MOSC Medical College Hospital, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
Kiran BennyDepartment of Orthopedics, MOSC Medical College Hospital, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
Midhun JoseDepartment of Orthopedics, MOSC Medical College Hospital, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Non-union of the humeral shaft with segmental bone loss is a challenging clinical problem, especially in elderly patients, where conventional reconstruction with cortical fibular graft carries significant donor site morbidity. The advent of 3D printing technology offers novel solutions for patient-specific reconstruction. Case Report: We report the case of a 70-year-old female with atrophic non-union of the right humeral shaft and 13.68 cm segmental bone loss, 6 years after locking compression plate fixation. Clinically, she had painless abnormal mobility at the fracture site and restricted shoulder motion, without signs of infection. Imaging revealed extensive osteolysis and bone loss. A patient-specific intercalary humerus prosthesis was designed using 3D printing technology. The prosthesis featured a porous lattice structure to facilitate osteointegration and was secured with a customized titanium plate and locking screws for optimal stability. Reconstruction achieved stable fixation with restoration of alignment. The patient had improved limb stability and function with early mobilization. Conclusion: Custom 3D-printed intercalary humerus prosthesis can be a viable alternative to traditional bone grafting in selected cases of humeral shaft non-union with extensive segmental bone loss, offering stable fixation, early functional recovery, and reduced morbidity.

Indexed as

3D printingbone lossHumerus nonunionintercalary prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID41669019
PMCPMC12884297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.