Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668985›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2026

Evaluation of Variability of Dosiomics Features with Varying Prescribed Dose in Prostate Cancer.

Marziyeh Mirzaeiyan, Simin Hemati, Ali Akhavan, Mahnaz Etehadtavakol, Zahra Sharifonnasabi, Alireza Amouheidari, Atoosa Adibi, Hossein Khanahmad, Parvaneh Shokrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marziyeh MirzaeiyanDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Simin HematiDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ali AkhavanDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mahnaz EtehadtavakolDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Zahra SharifonnasabiDepartment of Statistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza AmouheidariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Isfahan Milad Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Atoosa AdibiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Hossein KhanahmadDepartment of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Parvaneh ShokraniDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dosiomics involves converting 3D dose distribution matrices into quantifiable data for analysis. Evaluating the stability of dosiomics features against different prescribed doses is essential before utilizing them for treatment plan assessment. Objective: The current study aimed to investigate dosiomics features variability resulting from different prescribed doses in 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans of prostate cancer patients. Material and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study is conducted based on data from ten prostate cancer patients, and their dose matrices were analyzed to extract features. The stability of dosiomics features was evaluated using the Coefficient of Variation (CV). Results: For each patient, 372 features were extracted for each of the five selected regions of interest. Features with a CV>0.25 have been considered with higher variability. Among the Gray Level Size Zone Matrix group, the Planning Target Volume (PTV) exhibited the highest CV value. Overall, 71% of the features had a CV<0.1, while 5.9% of those had a CV>0.25. Less than 2% of the features had a CV>0.5, and only less than 1% had a CV>1. Features with a CV>0.25 were as follows 33 features in PTV, 60 features in PTV-All, 63 features in PTV-Lymph Node, 65 features in the rectum, and 54 features in the bladder. Conclusion: The prescribed dose significantly influences the variability of dosiomics features during extraction. Understanding these changes is essential for the optimal application of dosiomics in treatment planning for cancer.

Indexed as

DosiomicsProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy DosageStability

Identifiers

PMID41668985
PMCPMC12883922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.