ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2026
Evaluation of Variability of Dosiomics Features with Varying Prescribed Dose in Prostate Cancer.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dosiomics involves converting 3D dose distribution matrices into quantifiable data for analysis. Evaluating the stability of dosiomics features against different prescribed doses is essential before utilizing them for treatment plan assessment. Objective: The current study aimed to investigate dosiomics features variability resulting from different prescribed doses in 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans of prostate cancer patients. Material and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study is conducted based on data from ten prostate cancer patients, and their dose matrices were analyzed to extract features. The stability of dosiomics features was evaluated using the Coefficient of Variation (CV). Results: For each patient, 372 features were extracted for each of the five selected regions of interest. Features with a CV>0.25 have been considered with higher variability. Among the Gray Level Size Zone Matrix group, the Planning Target Volume (PTV) exhibited the highest CV value. Overall, 71% of the features had a CV<0.1, while 5.9% of those had a CV>0.25. Less than 2% of the features had a CV>0.5, and only less than 1% had a CV>1. Features with a CV>0.25 were as follows 33 features in PTV, 60 features in PTV-All, 63 features in PTV-Lymph Node, 65 features in the rectum, and 54 features in the bladder. Conclusion: The prescribed dose significantly influences the variability of dosiomics features during extraction. Understanding these changes is essential for the optimal application of dosiomics in treatment planning for cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.