ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026
Patient experiences of PMR: a qualitative narrative literature review.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: PMR is a common inflammatory condition characterized by pain and stiffness in the shoulders and hips. Patient experiences of PMR remain underexplored and often diverge significantly from clinician perspectives, contributing to the overall burden of the disease. This review forms part of an ongoing project conducted by the PMR Working Group of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) with the aim of exploring patient views of 'relapse' and 'remission'. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL) from database inception to 31/01/2025, to identify qualitative studies reporting patient experience in PMR. Study quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative tool, and thematic synthesis used to integrate findings. Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria and thematic analysis revealed three overarching themes: (1) the pathway to diagnosis, (2) managing uncertainty and (3) challenges to everyday life. Subthemes provided deeper insights into patient experiences, including delays in help-seeking due to the rationalization of symptoms, and complex responses to glucocorticoid treatment, described by participants as a 'double-edged sword', offering rapid improvement in symptoms but also causing significant distress. Notably, commonly used clinical terms such as 'relapse' and 'remission' were often inconsistent with how patients described their own experiences, underscoring a gap between clinical definitions and patient experiences. Conclusion: This qualitative narrative literature review reveals the unique challenges of disease management and the complex realities of long-term glucocorticoid use. These findings highlight the urgent need for more patient-centred approaches to care and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.