ArticleBiology of sport2026
Neuromechanical effects and predictive profiling of sprint priming strategies in elite youth sprinters.
Article in Biology of sport, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the acute biomechanical effects of three distinct sprint-specific priming strategies - resisted sprinting, assisted sprinting (i.e., overspeed), and technical wicket drills - on neuromechanical performance during 50-m sprint trials in elite youth sprinters. Twelve nationally ranked female youth sprinters (17.3 ± 0.8 years) participated in a randomized, repeated-measures protocol. Each athlete performed baseline 50-m maximal sprints, followed by three separate priming interventions, with performance re-evaluated at 24 h and 48 h post-activation. Key outcome measures included 50-m sprint time, reactive strength index (RSI), ground contact time (GCT), flight time (FT), step length, step frequency, duty factor, and asymmetry metrics. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, principal component analysis (PCA), k-means clustering, and machine learning classifiers. Assisted sprinting produced the greatest improvements in RSI (+0.13) and the largest reductions in GCT (-16 ms) at 48 h post-activation (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.