ArticleBiology of sport2026
Effects of different velocity loss thresholds on strength, neuromuscular adaptations, and muscle hypertrophy during bench press training in women.
Article in Biology of sport, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does baseline strength influence adaptations to velocity loss threshold-based resistance training?BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the effect of three velocity loss (VL) thresholds - 0% (VL0: one repetition per set), 25% (VL25), and 50% (VL50) - on strength gains, neuromuscular adaptations, and muscle hypertrophy during the bench press (BP) exercise. Forty-nine resistance-trained women were randomly assigned to three groups that followed an 8-week (16 sessions) BP training program using intensities ranging from 70% to 85% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Training groups differed in the VL achieved in each set (VL0, VL25, and VL50). Assessments performed before and after the training program included: 1) muscle thickness of the triceps brachii (TB); 2) maximal isometric test; 3) progressive loading test; and 4) fatigue test, all in the BP exercise. Electromyography signal was recorded from TB during these tests. Although all groups obtained significant gains in all strength variables, VL50 showed greater gains in 1RM strength and velocity against heavy loads than VL0 (group × time interaction: P < 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). Significant improvements in the force-time variables and electromyography amplitude (P = 0.01, with light loads) were observed exclusively in the VL25 group. Additionally, only VL50 exhibited significant increases in TB muscle thickness (P = 0.01). The greater the VL threshold, the more positive the effects on performance against heavy loads and muscle hypertrophy. Moderate VL thresholds improved the ability to produce force at high velocity and led to positive neuromuscular adaptations. Performing only one repetition per set was enough to improve strength in intermediate-trained women but was insufficient to maximize strength gains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.