ReviewGland surgery2026
Recipient vessel selection in autologous breast reconstruction: a narrative review of strategies and clinical implications.
Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Autologous breast reconstruction most commonly utilizes free tissue transfer to create a natural-appearing and aesthetically pleasing breast. A critical component of flap-based reconstruction is the selection of recipient vessels, yet the optimal choice, exposure, and technical utilization can vary. This study reviews the different options for recipient vessel selection along with the critical factors that influence decision-making and surgical technique in these cases. Methods: A literature review of PubMed/MEDLINE databases was performed from inception to June 2025 to identify recipient vessels utilized in autologous breast reconstruction. Key words included "recipient vessels", "breast reconstruction", "autologous reconstruction", and "microsurgery". Original and review articles in English were included. Studies were analyzed for discussion of indications, advantages, and drawbacks of one or more recipient options. Key Content and Findings: A multitude of factors influence decision-making in recipient selection and technique including flap choice, mastectomy type, prior operations and surgeon preference. Internal mammary (IM) vessels are the first-line choice. Internal mammary perforators (IMPs) have been explored to reduce morbidity but lack reliability. Thoracodorsal (TD) vessels and other axillary selections can be utilized in appropriately selected patients, typically as second-line options. Conclusions: Advancements in reconstructive techniques have changed the landscape for optimal recipient vessel selection from TD vessels to IM vessels. Options for free flap breast reconstruction continue to evolve toward improving aesthetic outcomes, increasing efficiency, and minimizing recipient site morbidity. Currently, IMP techniques are the forefront of continued innovation, but alternative recipient vessels may be appropriate in select individuals after considering patient factors and surgeon experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.