Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668920›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2026

A review of nipple-areola complex reconstruction and tattooing techniques.

Patricia M Fuentes, Emma Lascar, Sahil Sharma, Sheuli Chowdhury, Rachel Lee, Divleen Singh, Peter J Taub, Peter W Henderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patricia M FuentesDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5691-519X
Emma LascarDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Sahil SharmaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Sheuli ChowdhuryDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Rachel LeeCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Divleen SinghRenaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Peter J TaubDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Peter W HendersonDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women, and as survival continues to improve, increasing attention has been placed on optimizing quality of life after treatment. Breast reconstruction is an important part of this process and remains among the top five reconstructive procedures performed in the United States. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is often the final-and in many ways the most rewarding-step in the reconstructive sequence. NAC reconstruction plays a critical role in psychological recovery by helping patients regain a sense of wholeness after mastectomy. The objective of this study was to provide an overarching review on NAC reconstruction techniques, drawing from published literature and current institutional practices. A narrative review was conducted by querying PubMed using the terms ("NAC" OR "nipple-areolar complex") AND ("reconstruction" OR "tattoo") to synthesize contemporary literature on NAC reconstruction techniques including local flaps, grafts, implant devices, and tattooing. Additionally, patients who underwent NAC reconstruction at a single academic institution were reviewed and outcomes included. Local flaps are the foundation of surgical NAC reconstruction, though projection loss can vary from 40-75% depending on flap type. Adjuncts such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), bioabsorbable scaffolds, and implant devices can improve projection durability. Tattooing techniques have advanced substantially able to deliver three dimensional results with a high patient satisfaction and minimal down time; however, pigment fading is common. NAC reconstruction is an individualized process that can be achieved using a variety of tools including flaps, implant devices, and tattooing. These techniques can be used in combination or on their own depending on patient preference and anatomy with the goal of delivering symmetry, durability, and high satisfaction.

Indexed as

breast reconstructionflapnipple-areola complex (NAC)Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction (NAC reconstruction)tattoo

Identifiers

PMID41668920
PMCPMC12884090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.