ReviewGland surgery2026
A review of nipple-areola complex reconstruction and tattooing techniques.
Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of Sex-Specific Immediate Breast Reconstruction Trends Following Mastectomy Between 2005 and 2023.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women, and as survival continues to improve, increasing attention has been placed on optimizing quality of life after treatment. Breast reconstruction is an important part of this process and remains among the top five reconstructive procedures performed in the United States. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is often the final-and in many ways the most rewarding-step in the reconstructive sequence. NAC reconstruction plays a critical role in psychological recovery by helping patients regain a sense of wholeness after mastectomy. The objective of this study was to provide an overarching review on NAC reconstruction techniques, drawing from published literature and current institutional practices. A narrative review was conducted by querying PubMed using the terms ("NAC" OR "nipple-areolar complex") AND ("reconstruction" OR "tattoo") to synthesize contemporary literature on NAC reconstruction techniques including local flaps, grafts, implant devices, and tattooing. Additionally, patients who underwent NAC reconstruction at a single academic institution were reviewed and outcomes included. Local flaps are the foundation of surgical NAC reconstruction, though projection loss can vary from 40-75% depending on flap type. Adjuncts such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), bioabsorbable scaffolds, and implant devices can improve projection durability. Tattooing techniques have advanced substantially able to deliver three dimensional results with a high patient satisfaction and minimal down time; however, pigment fading is common. NAC reconstruction is an individualized process that can be achieved using a variety of tools including flaps, implant devices, and tattooing. These techniques can be used in combination or on their own depending on patient preference and anatomy with the goal of delivering symmetry, durability, and high satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.