ArticleGland surgery2026
Investigation of the current status of lymphedema management in 45 hospitals in China.
Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer-related lymphedema (CRL) seriously affects patients' quality of life. Many practice guidelines emphasize the importance of early prevention. However, a significant gap exists between these guidelines and clinical practice. This study aimed to understand the current status of lymphedema management in Chinese hospitals and to provide a basis for promoting standardized practices in lymphedema care. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from September to November 2024 using a self-designed questionnaire on lymphedema management. A convenience sample of 45 hospitals nationwide was surveyed. Results: The survey revealed that 60% of hospitals had established outpatient clinics for lymphedema, while 46.7% routinely implemented manual lymphatic drainage. Additionally, 68.9% of hospitals performed routine high-risk screening or preoperative assessments for lymphedema. Regarding treatment management, the application rate of complete decongestive therapy (CDT) was 88.9%, but 42.2% of hospitals lacked a standardized fee system. Concerning personnel training, 37.8% of hospitals had not conducted lymphedema training. Conclusions: Challenges in lymphedema management in Chinese hospitals include the limited implementation of standardized care protocols, incomplete fee systems for treatments, and the low coverage of specialized training. Efforts should focus on enhancing medical staff training, establishing standardized care pathways, and improving technical fee structures to advance the standardized development of lymphedema care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.