ReviewCurrent urology2026
A simplified algorithm for management of CP/CPPS and associated entities: A summary table for general urologists.
Review in Current urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial comment on Chinese expert consensus on prostate-pelvic syndrome.Current urology · 2026Article
- Neurobiology of Anxiety and Depression in CP/CPPS: A Narrative Review of Underlying Mechanisms.Neurology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) accounts for 25% urology clinic visits. Due to significant overlap with other conditions, CP/CPPS is frequently misdiagnosed and inadequately managed. Therefore, we provided a simplified diagnostic and treatment approach to CP/CPPS by subdividing it into distinct subcategories. Materials and methods: We systematically reviewed the published literature about CP/CPPS and its "associated entities", including interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, chronic bacterial vesiculitis, symptomatic prostate calcification, pudendal neuropathy, male accessory gland Inflammation, and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. We applied the UPOINTS system to differentiate CP/CPPS phenotypes, using male accessory gland inflammation solely to flag potential inflammatory-pelvic pain overlap. Results: The review yielded an evidence base of 140 articles pertaining to CP/CPPS treatment antibiotics, α-blockers, anti-inflammatory drugs, phytotherapeutics, neuromodulators, physical therapy, local blocks, injections, and minimal invasive treatments. CP/CPPS, interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, chronic bacterial vesiculitis, symptomatic prostate calcification, pudendal neuropathy, and C trachomatis infection, and developed type-specific, step-by-step diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. The proposed treatment model includes physiotherapy, minimally invasive options, and innovative interventions. Conclusions: Dividing CP/CPPS into 6 distinct subtypes offers clinicians more targeted guidance when selecting appropriate diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions. Sperm analysis is recommended for patients with a history of infertility, painful ejaculation, or hematospermia, whereas pyospermia warrants investigation using semen cultures, polymerase chain reaction testing, and transrectal ultrasound. Ct-infection should be ruled out in young patients with prostatitis-like symptoms, burning micturition, "penile tip irritation," and a thick urethral discharge. Patients over 50 years of age who have failed conventional therapy may require cystoscopy. Transrectal ultrasound can help rule out clustered prostatic calcifications, especially in older, overweight patients with a persistently elevated International Prostate Symptom Score and an increased white blood cell count in postprostatic massage urine. This approach is recommended for guiding CP/CPPS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.