Trial reportCardiovascular therapeutics2026
Impella Versus Selective Biatrial Canulation for Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
Trial report in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO
UNLOAD ECMO - Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO - a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impella Versus Selective Biatrial Canulation for Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Comparisons of preload unloading techniques for left ventricle overdistension during venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support are scarce. We compared outcomes in patients with left ventricular distension treated with cannulated percutaneous atrioseptostomy combined with ECMO-specified as selective biatrial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (SBA-ECMO)-versus those treated with Impella CP/5.0 in combination with ECMO (ECPELLA). Methods: Consecutive adult patients who received VA-ECMO and underwent additional left ventricle unloading between January 2014 and March 2023 were studied. The primary endpoint was the number of ventilation-free days. The secondary endpoints were serious bleeding, blood product consumption, thrombotic complications, and 28-day mortality. Results: We included 57 patients, 27 of whom received SBA-ECMO and 30 of whom received ECPELLA. The median number of ventilation-free days was 10 days (0-23) with SBA-ECMO and 5 days (0-23) with the ECPELLA ( Conclusions: In patients with left ventricle congestion during VA-ECMO support, left ventricle unloading with SBA-ECMO was associated with reduced serious bleeding and transfusions compared with ECPELLA, despite a similar number of ventilation-free days, thrombotic complications, and mortality. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03431467 and NCT05577195.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.