Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668870›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet2025

Cultural Adaptation and Acceptability of the Crisis Conversation Guide by Emergency Physicians for Serious Illness Patients: Mixed Methods Study.

Thidathit Prachanukool, Thavinee Trinarongsakul, Thapanawong Mitsungnern, Natthakorn Pongsettakul, Attakorn Raksasataya, Thiti Wongtangman, Kittiphon Nagaviroj, Pratamaporn Chanthong, Sarayut Kahapana, Hannah Oelschlager and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Thidathit PrachanukoolDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Thavinee TrinarongsakulDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thapanawong MitsungnernDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Natthakorn PongsettakulDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Attakorn RaksasatayaKarunruk Palliative Care Center, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Thiti WongtangmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lerdsin General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kittiphon NagavirojDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pratamaporn ChanthongSiriraj Palliative Care Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sarayut KahapanaSimulation Training Center, Bangkok Hospital Phuket, Phuket, Thailand.
Hannah OelschlagerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Scott David StoningtonDepartment of Internal Medicine and Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kei OuchiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

ED GOAL: An Advance Care Planning Intervention for Seriously Ill Older Adults in the Emergency DepartmentK76AG064434 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI OUCHI, KEI · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG064434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During a medical crisis, emergency physicians often discuss life-saving interventions with seriously ill patients and their families. Crisis conversations require strong communication skills and a patient-centered approach. Objective: To culturally adapt and assess the acceptability of an existing English crisis conversation guide for use by emergency physicians in Thailand. Materials and Methods: A three-stage mixed-method study was conducted. The initial stage included the translation and cultural adaptation of an English crisis conversation guide to Thai using a modified Delphi method with an expert panel's consensus. The expert panel included four emergency physicians and four palliative care clinicians. The second stage involved surveying Thai emergency physicians on the perceived necessity of each step of the conversation guide using a 5-point Likert scale. In the third stage, the expert panel reviewed the survey results and incorporated feedback to produce the final Thai crisis conversation guide. Results: The Thai crisis conversation guide was initially adapted from the English original via Thai word adaptation and practical rearrangement. In the refinement stage, the expert panel modified several strategies for exploring patient values and added a new step to the conversation guide, which the authors term "gathering the decision makers". The acceptability survey was completed by 180 Thai emergency physicians, with a 36% response rate. These physicians reported that the step with the strongest perceived necessity in the conversation guide was "summarize goal of care" with 176 participants (98%) responding "agree" and "strongly agree". Conclusion: The crisis conversation guide was culturally adapted for clinical practice in Thailand. More than 88% of Thai emergency physicians reported the conversation guide to be acceptable in their clinical practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationCrisis conversationEmergency medicineGoal of care conversationPalliative careSerious illness conversation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.