Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668857›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Exploring antibiotic stewardship interventions within a One Health context: a scoping review.

Léo Delpy, Chloe Clifford Astbury, Olivier Kambere Kavulikirwa, Mouhamadou Moustapha Sow, Sandrina Vandenput, Cécile Aenishaenslin, Arne Ruckert, Ria Benko, Mary Wiktorowicz, Tarra L Penney and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Léo DelpyASTRE, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
Chloe Clifford AstburySchool of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Olivier Kambere KavulikirwaDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mouhamadou Moustapha SowNational Laboratory for Livestock and Veterinary Research, Senegalese Institute of Research in Agriculture, Dakar, Senegal.
Sandrina VandenputHealth Sciences Library, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Cécile AenishaenslinDépartement de pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Arne RuckertGlobal Strategy Lab, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ria BenkoFaculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Mary WiktorowiczDahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tarra L PenneyGlobal Strategy Lab, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
A M ViensSchool of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marion BordierASTRE, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) presents a global threat to human health, animal health, and the environment. While ABR is a natural phenomenon, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in human health, animal health, and food production is a major driver of ABR. As interactions between humans, animals, and the environment are central to the emergence and spread of ABR, adopting a One Health approach is essential to effectively address the issue. In this context, a large range of antibiotic stewardship interventions has been developed to optimize the use of antibiotics. However, we lack a comprehensive overview of the landscape of antibiotic stewardship interventions from a One Health perspective. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of existing policy interventions. The literature review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We systematically searched three major databases to retrieve interventions meeting our inclusion criteria. We purposively sampled some of these interventions to illustrate the diversity of existing interventions. These sampled interventions were then assessed according to 26 variables related to their general characteristics, development and implementation mode, scope, One Health and equity dimensions, and impacts. We conducted a descriptive analysis on the data extracted to summarize the characteristics of the antibiotic stewardship interventions. The 29 selected interventions focus on communication with stakeholders and the general public, access to antibiotics and their usage, and antibiotic disposal. Regarding their One Health aspects, the interventions varied in terms of collaboration across sectors and levels, engagement with the private sector, and equity considerations. Strong livestock industry engagement, efficient legal and institutional frameworks and provision of alternatives to antibiotics acted as facilitators to intervention implementation and success. Interventions demonstrated effects in terms of changes in antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, awareness, and practices, as well as impacts on animal health and productivity. This study highlights the persistent dominance of human health objectives in the design and implementation of One Health antibiotic stewardship interventions and the continuous need to strengthen evaluation of such interventions to better understand facilitators and barriers to their implementation as well as intervention impacts.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipOne HealthAnimalsHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic use and resistanceantimicrobial use and resistanceinterventionslegal instrumentsOne Healthstewardship

Identifiers

PMID41668857
PMCPMC12883812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.