SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Benefit finding in adults living with somatic non-communicable chronic disease: a systematic review on the mean level and the prevalence.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Benefit finding (BF) refers to the phenomenon of identifying positive changes from challenging circumstances. This review aimed to comprehensively assess the BF prevalence in persons with somatic non-communicable chronic diseases (pSNCDs). Materials and methods: Electronic databases were systematically searched using the concept "benefit finding". Eligible studies (adult persons with SNCDs, BF measured by the Benefit Finding Scale, written in English, observational in design, and published until June 30, 2023) were reviewed and underwent quality and publication bias assessments; prevalence and mean were extracted and synthesized. Results: Of the 55 included articles, 35 were rated "weak", 18 "moderate", and 2 "strong" in quality. BF mean was 3.25 (25,972 observations), BF prevalence was 97.5% (10,720 observations), and moderate-to-high BF prevalence was 74.1% (12,363 observations). Subgroup analysis indicated higher moderate-to-high BF in cancer survivors (highest: 89% in breast cancer) than non-cancer survivors (highest: 72.4% in HIV). The lowest BF and moderate-to-high BF prevalence occurred in cancer survivors aged 60 +. Meta-regression suggested that study design and quality, time since diagnosis, gender, and mean age may explain heterogeneity in BF means. Subgroup analyses showed the lowest BF mean in pSNCDs aged 70+ years. Discussion: Persons with SNCDs generally reported a moderate BF mean. Age is an important factor associated with BF. Future studies are needed to better understand how pSNCDs find/perceive benefits, especially for older adults aged 60+ years. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022308513, identifier CRD42022308513.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.