ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2026
Update of the statement on safety of cannabidiol as a novel food.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety of synthetic cannabidiol as a novel food pursuant to regulation (EU) 2015/2283.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Safety ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Safety of cannabidiol isolated fromEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Regulation and Use of Cannabidiol in Croatia Compared with Selected European and International Models: From Consumer Products to Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pharmacological Switching in Minor Phytocannabinoids: A Mechanistic Framework for Compound-Indication Matching and Precision Neurotherapeutic Development.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Cannabidiol in Dysbiosis-Related Oral Biofilm Diseases: Antibiofilm, Antivirulence and Host Response Evidence.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Sprouts from Eight Hemp (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cannabidiol in Dietary Supplements: Characteristics, Routes of Administration, Bioavailability, and Research Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Probiotic-Plant Bioactive Synergy in Gut Health: Mechanisms, Antimicrobial Activity, and Translational Challenges.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Safety of carbon dioxide extract fromEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Update of the statement on safety of cannabidiol as a novel food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the assessment of cannabidiol (CBD) as a novel food, in 2022 the NDA Panel identified significant data gaps. Concerns focused on potential adverse effects on the liver, gastrointestinal tract, endocrine, nervous and reproductive systems. Literature searches covering animal and human studies from the previous Statement until June 2024 confirmed the persistence of these gaps, as many of the new studies suffer from methodological limitations, including non-standardised protocols, short durations and concomitant treatment with medicine. Pharmacokinetic studies confirmed that CBD's bioavailability is variable, influenced by delivery matrix and food intake. Its ability to cross the placenta and accumulate systemically raises further safety concerns. Animal studies revealed consistent liver toxicity, with liver weight and histopathological changes emerging as sensitive endpoints. Human trials indicated hepatotoxic potential, particularly when CBD is used in combination with other medications. Gastrointestinal effects were reported at higher doses, while neurological and psychiatric safety data remain insufficient. Animal studies on reproductive toxicity reinforced the concern regarding this endpoint. Neurodevelopmental effects following prenatal exposure were observed, suggesting long-lasting, sex-specific outcomes. Endocrine disruptions were noted, including altered thyroid hormone levels and adrenal histopathology. No studies addressed immunotoxicity, though CBD's interaction with immune pathways warrants caution. The Panel performed benchmark dose modelling based on GLP-compliant subchronic studies to identify a toxicological reference point. By applying an uncertainty factor of 400, a provisional safe dose of 0.0275 mg/kg bw per day (approximately 2 mg/day for a 70 kg adult) was derived. This provisional safe dose applies solely to food supplement formulations with CBD purity ≥ 98%, without nanoparticles, for which the production process is considered safe and genotoxicity is ruled out. The Panel concludes that, based on all available data, the safety of CBD for individuals under 25 years of age, pregnant or lactating women, and those on concurrent medications, cannot be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.