Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668771›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2026

Update of the statement on safety of cannabidiol as a novel food.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Dominique Turck, Torsten Bohn, Montaña Cámara, Jacqueline Castenmiller, Stefaan De Henauw, Ángeles Jos, Alexandre Maciuk, Inge Mangelsdorf, Breige McNulty and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Safety ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  3. Safety of cannabidiol isolated fromEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Safety of carbon dioxide extract fromEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  11. Update of the statement on safety of cannabidiol as a novel food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA)
Dominique Turck
Torsten Bohn
Montaña Cámara
Jacqueline Castenmiller
Stefaan De Henauw
Ángeles Jos
Alexandre Maciuk
Inge Mangelsdorf
Breige McNulty
Androniki Naska
Kristina Pentieva
Alfonso Siani
Frank Thies
Francesco Cubadda
Helle Katrine Knutsen
Harry J McArdle
Peter Moldeus
Monika Neuhäuser-Berthold
Josef Rudolf Schlatter
Alexandros Siskos
Viviana Trezza
Océane Albert
Elisa Beneventi
Irene Nuin Garciarena
George E N Kass
Marcello Laganaro
Annamaria Rossi
Alejandra Muñoz
Areti Favata
Anna Maria Pieger
Maura Magani
Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the assessment of cannabidiol (CBD) as a novel food, in 2022 the NDA Panel identified significant data gaps. Concerns focused on potential adverse effects on the liver, gastrointestinal tract, endocrine, nervous and reproductive systems. Literature searches covering animal and human studies from the previous Statement until June 2024 confirmed the persistence of these gaps, as many of the new studies suffer from methodological limitations, including non-standardised protocols, short durations and concomitant treatment with medicine. Pharmacokinetic studies confirmed that CBD's bioavailability is variable, influenced by delivery matrix and food intake. Its ability to cross the placenta and accumulate systemically raises further safety concerns. Animal studies revealed consistent liver toxicity, with liver weight and histopathological changes emerging as sensitive endpoints. Human trials indicated hepatotoxic potential, particularly when CBD is used in combination with other medications. Gastrointestinal effects were reported at higher doses, while neurological and psychiatric safety data remain insufficient. Animal studies on reproductive toxicity reinforced the concern regarding this endpoint. Neurodevelopmental effects following prenatal exposure were observed, suggesting long-lasting, sex-specific outcomes. Endocrine disruptions were noted, including altered thyroid hormone levels and adrenal histopathology. No studies addressed immunotoxicity, though CBD's interaction with immune pathways warrants caution. The Panel performed benchmark dose modelling based on GLP-compliant subchronic studies to identify a toxicological reference point. By applying an uncertainty factor of 400, a provisional safe dose of 0.0275 mg/kg bw per day (approximately 2 mg/day for a 70 kg adult) was derived. This provisional safe dose applies solely to food supplement formulations with CBD purity ≥ 98%, without nanoparticles, for which the production process is considered safe and genotoxicity is ruled out. The Panel concludes that, based on all available data, the safety of CBD for individuals under 25 years of age, pregnant or lactating women, and those on concurrent medications, cannot be established.

Indexed as

CannabidiolCBDdata gapsnovel foodsafety

Identifiers

PMID41668771
PMCPMC12884199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.