ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Stimuli-responsive nanoplatforms for precision activation of the STING pathway in cancer immunotherapy.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunomodulatory Nanozymes as Programmable Redox-Immune Set-Point Regulators.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Coumarin and Curcumin-Metal Complexes as Next-Generation Photosensitizers in Cancer Photodynamic Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Dual-Function Lipid-Based Nanovector Strategy for Glioblastoma Immunotherapy: STING Activation and M1 Microglia Polarization.Drug development research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway plays a unique role in antitumor immunity, bridging innate and adaptive immune responses to initiate a sustained and highly effective antitumor immune response. However, due to the widespread expression of the STING pathway and the lack of clearly distinguishable physiological and pathological features, its excessive or systemic activation can trigger severe adverse effects, such as cytokine storms, thereby limiting its clinical applicability. With the development of nanotechnology, stimuli-responsive nanoplatforms designed based on tumor microenvironment (TME) signals (such as pH, glutathione, reactive oxygen species, hypoxia, and enzymes) and exogenous stimuli (including light, ultrasound, radiation, and magnetic fields) provide a promising strategy for the precise activation of the STING pathway. These nanoplatforms can achieve tumor-specific and controllable STING activation, thereby minimizing off-target toxicity, and can be combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or photodynamic therapy to produce multimodal synergistic antitumor effects. Here, we provide a systematic overview of stimuli-responsive nanoplatforms for STING activation, highlighting their design strategies and how they can reverse immunosuppressive TME through STING pathway activation. Additionally, we discuss the challenges facing their clinical translation and outline future directions, aiming to provide a foundation for further research in this field. In conclusion, stimuli-responsive STING-activating nanoplatforms demonstrate significant potential in antitumor therapy and may serve as a novel therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.