ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2026
Comparing multi- and single-exposure speckle contrast optical spectroscopy methods as estimators of blood flow in the diffuse regime.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global reset-speckle contrast optical spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Time-resolved laser speckle contrast imaging (TR-LSCI) of cerebral blood flow response to intracranial pressure elevation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Comparative validation of speckle contrast optical spectroscopy against diffuse correlation spectroscopy for monitoring human cerebral blood flow.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Speckle contrast optical spectroscopy (SCOS) and speckle plethysmography (SPG) are increasingly used to measure deep tissue blood flow from tissues. However these methods derive flow from measurements at a single exposure duration, which could introduce errors due to inefficient choice of a single integration time, changes in speckle averaging factors ( Aim: The aims are to compare and evaluate the robustness of single- and multi-exposure speckle contrast methods in estimating blood flow changes under experimental conditions such as Approach: Speckle visibility was simulated at 10,000 logarithmically spaced exposure durations (0.01 to 10 ms), incorporating Results: Multi-exposure speckle imaging (MESI) maintained Conclusions: MESI outperformed single-exposure approaches in estimating blood flow changes by reducing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.