ArticleOcean dynamics2026
Assessing the temporal clustering of coastal storm tide hazards under natural variability in a near 500-year model run.
Article in Ocean dynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The temporal clustering of storms can present successive natural hazards for coastal areas in the form of extreme sea levels, storm surges and waves. Studies have investigated the prevalence of the temporal clustering of such hazards but are hindered by the rarity of the phenomena combined with short records and a lack of data availability around the coastline. This has made it difficult to determine if the levels of clustering reported were typical for the location or were being masked by natural variability or climate change over different timescales. In this study, we assess a near 500-year model simulation of extreme sea levels and storm surges forced with pre-industrial meteorological conditions to quantify the levels of temporal clustering seen from natural variability around Great Britain. We then utilise a 50-year rolling window to see how clustering statistics can change through time when dealing with time periods that are representative of the average length of a record in the United Kingdom National Tide Gauge Network. When using near 500-year timeseries, we highlight that many clustering statistics return values close to their statistical expectancies. However, when analysing discrete 50-year windows, results can vary dramatically. The percentage of years with an extreme sea level or surge exceedance at a given location at the 1 in 1-, 5-, and 10-year return level, can vary by up to ~ 33%, ~ 24%, and ~ 18%, the mean number of days between consecutive sea level or surge exceedances can vary by ~ 231, ~14,780, and ~ 17,793 days, and the extremal index can vary by ~ 0.37, ~ 0.64, and ~ 0.79, respectively. Although these results represent the best estimate of the levels of clustering to be expected under natural variability, a comparison of the longest records in the tide gauge network and their nearest model grid nodes shows a tendency for the model to underestimate the clustering statistics that are calculated from the measured data (apart from the extremal index). As such, these can be considered to represent the minimum levels of temporal clustering around Great Britain, as the potential underestimation of clustering, combined with climatic change and sea level rise, means that the temporal clustering of sea levels and storm surges are likely to be far greater over the next 500 years. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10236-025-01766-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.