Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668697›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

Artificial intelligence for microembolic signal detection by transcranial Doppler in ischemic stroke: a mini-review.

Davide Sassos, Massimo Del Sette

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Davide SassosIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Massimo Del SetteIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microembolic signals (MES) detected by transcranial Doppler (TCD) provide real-time information on ongoing embolic activity in patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. MES have been associated with stroke recurrence and high-risk conditions including large-artery atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation, moyamoya disease, cancer-related stroke, and complex aortic arch plaques. Despite its clinical value, conventional TCD is limited by operator dependency, suboptimal acoustic windows, and limited ability to discriminate embolus characteristics. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning algorithms and robotic-assisted TCD systems, offer automated and reproducible MES detection, improved artifact rejection, and advanced signal interpretation. This mini-review summarizes the clinical relevance of MES, the main limitations of conventional TCD, and current and emerging applications of AI to MES detection, highlighting future perspectives for stroke risk stratification and personalized secondary prevention.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)automated emboli detectionembolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS)ischemic stroke (IS)machine learningmicroembolic signals (MES)stroke risk stratificationtranscranial Doppler (TCD)

Identifiers

PMID41668697
PMCPMC12883797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.