ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Benchmarking mobilization practice and functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a three-year service evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Mobilization is defined as the application of assisted movement and physical therapy to hospitalized patients, including progressive exercise and ambulation programs. While early mobilization in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been shown to be a safe and effective intervention to improve patient outcomes in the general ICU cohort, there is currently limited evidence specific to patients with acute TBI. The aim of this service evaluation was to identify current mobilization activity and functional outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU at our institution following an acute TBI. Methods: A single-center retrospective service evaluation was performed for all patients, over 16 years-old, admitted to the ICU at our institution (a Level 1 major trauma center) with an acute TBI between January 2022 and November 2024. Patient demographics, ICU admission details, TBI severity (based on the Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]) and functional outcomes were extracted. Mobilization outcomes included the timing of the commencement of mobilization (defined as sitting on the edge of the bed or better) and mobilization status, defined using the Manchester Mobility Scale (MMS). Results: The service evaluation included 353 patients, of whom 56.0% had severe TBI (GCS: 3-7). Mobilization was achieved in ICU for 53.0% of patients, with a further 18.1% first mobilized on a hospital ward post-ICU discharge. The first mobilization occurred at a median of 11 days (interquartile range: 6-18) after ICU admission. In patients surviving to ICU discharge, 28.9% had an MMS of 1 (bed-based exercises) at this time, with only 9.1% achieving an MMS of 7 (mobilizing 30 meters or more). Analysis by TBI severity found a significant decline in in-hospital mobilization rates with increasing TBI severity (90.7% vs. 58.4% for mild vs. severe TBI; Conclusion: Acute TBI patients admitted to the ICU at our institution had low rates of mobilization and achieved low levels of mobility at ICU discharge. This service evaluation highlights the need for prospective studies into early mobilization practices in the neurotrauma ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.