ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Chemical cues and molecular mechanisms suspected in abiotic stress communication.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For nearly a century, scientists have tried to resolve the sensory physiology of chemical communication caused by predation stress. Only recently have we evidenced that abiotic stressors from a changing world, such as heat and ocean acidification, also trigger chemical communication between aquatic organisms - which we dubbed abiotic stress communication. Generally, the behavioural and physiological response to stress-induced cues are well understood, whereas the molecular mechanisms - cue identities, pathways of release, and perception - of this stress communication remain unresolved. Here, we propose a framework to organize the existing evidence for candidate mechanisms involved in abiotic stress-induced chemical communication, focusing on heat and acidification as two major abiotic stressors with environmental relevance. Drawing on transcriptomic, metabolomic and behavioural evidence, we propose that stressor-specific communication likely involves multiple cues and parallel routes rather than a single mechanism, such as membrane-related processes. We call for integrative work that links -omics with chemical profiling and ecological function assays to uncover the mechanisms of abiotic stress communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.