ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2026
The visual challenges of short-range navigation in teleost fish.
Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To understand how fish use vision to navigate, we must first understand what they see. This Review explores how visually guided navigation in teleost fishes is shaped by the structure of their visual systems, the cognitive processes that interpret sensory input and the dynamic environments they inhabit. With broad variation in habitat, ecology and visual capabilities, fish provide a powerful system for examining how sensory conditions influence navigation. We focus on short-range navigation and review core strategies - beaconing, pilotage, path integration and spatial mapping - alongside the visual and cognitive demands each entails. To assess which strategies are available to different species, we examine the visual processing pathway, from eye and retinal anatomy to behavioural evidence from cognition studies. These reveal that fish process visual information in a variety of ways to perform a diverse range of visual functions, including motion perception, object recognition and generalisation across viewpoint or lighting changes. We consider how sensory limitations and visual noise may constrain navigational accuracy, and how context or visual ability might shape which strategies are used. Environmental changes, such as turbidity, light pollution, or habitat degradation or shifts, can further degrade cue availability and reliability, affecting navigational performance. Understanding how visual information is received, processed and applied is therefore essential not only for interpreting observed behaviours, but also for predicting how fish may respond to changing environments. By linking sensory input with spatial behaviour, we propose a framework that integrates perception, cognition and movement, offering new insight into how diverse visual systems shape navigation across species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.