ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Physiological effects of anthropogenic sound on aquatic animals: where are we and what is next?
Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many aquatic animals have a well-developed sense of hearing as sound is important for communication underwater. However, this trait leaves them susceptible to injury, and physiological and behavioral impacts from exposure to intense or persistent anthropogenic sounds. We provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on the physiological effects of five main sources of anthropogenic sound: marine traffic, seismic exploration, pile driving, other industrial activity and sonar. Our understanding of impacts varies greatly by sound type and taxon, although the studied species do not represent the full taxonomic diversity. Exposure to ship sounds has been best studied in fish and it generally leads to responses along the stress response cascade, while few studies have been conducted on its physiological effect on invertebrates or marine mammals. Effects of exposure to seismic sound show mixed impact across taxa. Pile driving sounds have been shown in captive studies to result in hearing impairment in marine mammals and can cause injury to fishes. Lethal impacts have been documented from naval sonar on marine mammal species. Currently, physiological impacts from other industrial sound sources are poorly documented across taxa. Overall, given the limited number of species examined in sound impact experiments, it is crucial to establish categorizing principles and guidelines and modeled response pathways to improve management strategies, especially as new sound threats continue to emerge in our changing world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.