ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders and Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Comparison of the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry With Other Danish Health Registries.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesComparison of recorded diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS) and related disorders and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry (DMSR) with other nationwide health registries. The aim of the study is to describe and compare information on diagnoses of MS and related disorders and treatments with DMTs available in three national registries, highlighting the key differences relevant to MS research and providing insight for researchers for their choice of data source(s) suitable for their study. MATERIALS AND
methodsDMSR is a disease registry encompassing information on persons with MS and related disorders. The Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) is a registry of activities at Danish hospitals. The Danish National Hospital Medication Registry (DNHMR) contains information on in-hospital prescription medications. The population comprised all persons in DMSR in 2023 who were alive or born after and residing in Denmark on January 1, 1995 (N = 26,474). For this population, we identified DNPR contacts with diagnoses of MS or related disorders and initiated DMTs in DNHMR. Diagnostic and demographic characteristics were reported as recorded in DMSR for the total population, and the subset included in DMSR but not in DNPR. Characteristics of the part of the population identified in DNPR were reported as recorded in DNPR. We calculated the proportions of DMT treatments in DMSR identified in DNHMR.
resultsOf the 26,474 persons, 23,857 (90.1%) were recorded with a diagnosis of MS or a related disorder in DNPR. Most (86.6%) of the 2617 persons not identified in DNPR were diagnosed before 1995. The proportion of persons with MS recorded without specification of the disease phenotype was 23.5% in the DMSR and 76.2% in the DNPR. After 2005, only 1.8% of persons with MS were recorded with an unspecified phenotype in DMSR. Of a total of 18,168 initiated DMT treatments in DMSR, 7230 (39.8%) were identified in DNHMR, with proportions ranging from 0.0% (mitoxantrone) to 88.5% (ocrelizumab).
conclusionsDMSR is suitable for disease-specific research addressing treatment efficacy, disease development, and long-term outcomes. In contrast, DNPR is well suited for broad epidemiological studies involving various health conditions and hospital utilization. The DNHMR will, when matured, be useful for studies involving medical treatment and comedication. However, as each registry has limitations, for most studies the best approach will be combining registries, depending on the research question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.