ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Partner Choice and Context-Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough-and-Tumble Play.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Partner Choice and Context-Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough-and-Tumble Play.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rough-and-tumble play (RTP) is the form of play most often observed in juvenile mammals. In rats, RTP typically consists of competing for access to the partner's nape, with both sex and social contexts influencing its frequency and structure. Although most studies employ dyadic tests, this design limits partner choice. Here, we investigated sex differences in partner preference and play frequency in Wistar rats using a group play paradigm. Juvenile rats were tested in mixed-sex and same-sex triads, allowing individuals to select partners. We measured playful nape attacks, defensive responses, and the distribution of play across partners. Results revealed that both sexes formed partner preferences, but only males exhibited sex-based preferences, directing significantly more playful attacks toward females than males. Female rats showed no group-level sex preference, though most individuals displayed consistent preferences for one partner, often, but not exclusively, for the male partner. Importantly, females initiated fewer nape attacks than males in mixed-sex groups, but this sex difference disappeared in all-female groups, where females initiated playful attacks at levels comparable to males. Thus, sex differences in RTP frequency were context dependent, emerging only when females were tested alongside males. These findings demonstrate two distinct forms of sex differences in the play of rats: partner choice and play frequency. Whereas males preferentially engage with females, females appear more flexible, forming idiosyncratic preferences independent of the partner's sex. Moreover, female play initiation is particularly sensitive to social context, highlighting the importance of group-based testing for understanding naturalistic social decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.