SynthesisAnnals of medicine2026
Comparative evaluation of molecular technologies for the identification of prevalent non-tuberculous mycobacteria in pulmonary infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM PD) is a burden to public health. Successful management of NTM PD critically depends on accurate species identification and reliable drug susceptibility testing to guide appropriate antibiotic therapy. Emerging molecular technologies offer rapid diagnostic solutions compared to conventional methods, but their performance varies. This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of current molecular techniques for NTM identification and to present a global antibiotic resistance profile.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science for studies published between 2005 and 2024. Studies applying molecular methods for NTM identification and resistance detection in humans were included. Data on study characteristics, diagnostic methods, sample types, sample sizes, identification sensitivity, and drug susceptibility results were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using R with the
resultsThe analysis included 49 studies on NTM identification and 33 studies on antibiotic resistance. For species identification, all evaluated molecular technologies (MALDI-TOF MS, PCR-based methods, Sequencing, DNA chip, and DNA strip) demonstrated high pooled sensitivities (>0.92). Subgroup analysis revealed that sample type significantly affected performance for MALDI-TOF MS. Preliminary analysis of antibiotic resistance rates revealed varying patterns. For slowly growing mycobacteria, a significantly high Ethambutol resistance rate was observed in
conclusionEmerging molecular technologies have revolutionized the methodology for NTM identification with excellent performance. However, their performance can be influenced by sample type, particularly for MALDI-TOF MS. The alarming and heterogeneous antibiotic resistance patterns also highlight the critical need for rapid and accurate species identification and drug susceptibility testing to inform effective therapeutic strategies. Key messagesMolecular technologies demonstrate high accuracy for NTM identification.Antibiotic resistance is a serious concern with variations among NTM species and subspecies.Rapid and accurate species identification and drug susceptibility testing are crucial for guiding effective clinical management of NTM PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.