Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668299›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2026

Microbial Diversity Across Chemolithotrophic and Phototrophic Biofilms in Cold Sulfur Springs.

David M Frings, James M Mellinger, Kevin M Drace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David M FringsDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
James M MellingerDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Kevin M DraceDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-9207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfur-rich environments host specialized microbial communities that drive key biogeochemical processes, particularly sulfur cycling. While sulfur-oxidizing microbiota from hydrothermal vents and volcanic systems are well studied, microbial communities in cold terrestrial sulfur springs remain less understood. In this study, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to examine how sulfur availability and environmental conditions shape microbial assemblages across different biofilm types in a cold sulfur spring system at Blount Springs, Alabama (33.9301° N, 86.7928° W). Sulfur-oxidizing chemolithotrophs, including Sulfurovum and Halothiobacillus, represented the majority of the recovered reads in sulfur-rich white biofilms, while purple phototrophic biofilms were enriched with anoxygenic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, such as Chromatium and Chlorobium. Nonsulfur biofilms from adjacent environments displayed greater microbial diversity, including a high abundance of photosynthetic diatoms, like, Melosira. Notably, Sulfurovum was abundant across both sulfur-rich and phototrophic niches, suggesting ecological flexibility and a central role in sulfur metabolism. These findings highlight the influence of sulfur chemistry and light availability in structuring microbial communities and contribute to a broader understanding of microbial adaptation and sulfur cycling in cold sulfur spring ecosystems.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodiversityBiofilmsSulfurChemoautotrophic GrowthCold TemperatureDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalPhototrophic ProcessesPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfurcold sulfur springsmicrobial ecologysulfur metabolismsulfur‐oxidizing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID41668299
PMCPMC12891434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.