Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668272›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2026

Incidence of Trans-Impedance Matrix Pattern Variants in Patients With Normal Anatomy Receiving Cochlear Implantation.

Justin Cottrell, Christine Schremp, Arianna Winchester, David Friedmann, Daniel Jethanamest, Emily Spitzer, Mario Svirsky, Susan B Waltzman, William H Shapiro, Sean McMenomey and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Justin CottrellDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-8434-5262
Christine SchrempDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
Arianna WinchesterDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
David FriedmannDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
Daniel JethanamestDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
Emily SpitzerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
Mario SvirskyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
Susan B WaltzmanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
William H ShapiroDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
Sean McMenomeyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.
J Thomas RolandDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY.

Funding

Perceptual Adaptation Following Cochlear ImplantationR01DC021980 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Mario A Svirsky · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC021980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to apply a previously developed transimpedance (TIM) heatmap pattern classification scheme in patients with no known risk factors for cochlear anomalies, in addition to patients implanted in the revision setting, to better understand the incidence of pattern variants, and potential clinical implications. STUDY

designSingle-center retrospective review.

settingTertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: Patients older than 6 months of age who underwent cochlear implantation between June 2020 and June 2024 with normal gross cochlear anatomy and no concern for fibrosis that had intraoperative TIM testing completed. Patients undergoing revision implantation were also included as a separate cohort.

interventionNone.

main outcome measuresThe number of patients with normal and variant TIM patterns was evaluated for each cohort. TIM patterns were subsequently compared with the electrode position found on intraoperative x-ray.

resultsThere were 321 ears that underwent implantation and subsequent intraoperative TIM assessment meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 310 (96.6%) were in the primary surgery setting, and 11 (3.4%) were in the revision surgical setting. In the primary surgical setting, 86.4% (n=268) of the implants demonstrated a normal TIM heatmap. Compared with the primary surgical setting, where only 45.5% (n=5) of revision surgery TIM heatmaps were interpreted as normal. One patient in the revision setting had a newly identified "double X" pattern corresponding to a normal electrode position on x-ray.

conclusionsThere is a decreased incidence of previously developed TIM heatmap pattern variants in CI recipients with normal gross cochlear anatomy.

Indexed as

CochleaCochlear ImplantationElectric ImpedanceChildChild, PreschoolCochlear ImplantsFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleReoperationRetrospective StudiesCochlear implantCochlear implant placementPlacement confirmationTrans-impedance matrix

Identifiers

PMID41668272
PMCPMC13335585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.