SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2026
Potential application of brain-gut axis-based treatments in Long COVID and ME/CFS: a case-based systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and Long COVID share clinical features including persistent fatigue, post-exertional malaise (PEM), and gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction. Growing evidence implicates brain-gut axis dysregulation, characterized by dysbiosis, neuroinflammation within the central nervous system (CNS), increased intestinal permeability, and microbial translocation in their pathophysiology. However, therapeutic strategies targeting these pathways remain poorly defined.
methodsWe report a case of post-COVID ME/CFS successfully treated with electroacupuncture (EA)-based deep peroneal nerve stimulation which was employed to potentiate the vagal reflex. Fatigue trajectories were assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory over 12 weeks. Based on the case, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating brain-gut axis-modulating interventions in ME/CFS or Long COVID was conducted.
resultsThe patient exhibited a significant reduction in total fatigue, with early improvements in motivation and mental fatigue, and delayed improvement in physical fatigue following transient systemic symptom flares. Across included RCTs (n = 8, 790 participants), four investigated gut microbiome-modulating therapies and four employed nerve stimulation. Synbiotic and herbal interventions demonstrated benefits for fatigue or PEM, accompanied by alterations in specific bacterial populations or CNS metabolisms. Regarding nerve stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with exercise program improved fatigue, whereas standalone tDCS, auricular or peripheral TENS showed limited efficacy.
conclusionBrain-gut axis-based interventions may alleviate fatigue in ME/CFS and Long COVID by potentially modulating neuroinflammation, restoring microbiome balance, and improving epithelial barrier function. EA-based vagal stimulation represents a feasible option for patients with severe or treatment-resistant symptoms. Larger mechanistic studies and rigorously designed RCTs are needed to establish therapeutic targets and optimize intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.