ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Six-week effects of ankle bracing and taping on specific performance in tennis collegiate players: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnkle injury prevention is critically important in tennis. Although prophylactic ankle supports can effectively reduce the risk of injury, they may potentially impair athletic performance. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate both immediate and six-week effects of ankle taping and bracing on tennis-specific performance in male collegiate tennis players, thereby supporting evidence-based application.
methodsForty-five male collegiate tennis players were randomized into three groups, namely the brace group (BG), the taping group (TG), and the control group (CG). Participants in BG and TG wore ankle supports during tennis sessions for six weeks, whereas those in the CG trained without any support. Performance was measured at five time points: baseline (Tb), immediately after the intervention (T0), and at biweekly intervals thereafter (T2, T4, and T6). Outcomes included four tennis-specific performance measures, the International Tennis Number On-court Assessment, and self-perception questionnaires. The performance measures included vertical jump, 10-meter sprint, sideline to forward sprint, and sideline turn-back sprint.
resultsAfter adjusting for baseline (Tb) using a linear mixed model, both ankle braces and taping demonstrated immediate improvements at T0 compared with the control group in the 10-m sprint (BG vs. CG: p = 0.002, TG vs. CG: p = 0.001) and left sideline to forward sprint (BG vs. CG: p = 0.026, TG vs. CG: p = 0.043). However, in the ITN mobility test, the brace group was significantly slower than the control group (MD = 0.958s, p = 0.044). We found a significant Group × Time interaction in the 10-m sprint (F = 9.736, p < 0.001) and the sideline to forward sprint (Left: p = 0.002; Right: p = 0.011). The brace group recorded its fastest 10-m sprint time at Week 2 (p < 0.001), whereas the taping group did so at Week 4 (p < 0.001). A significant main effect of time was observed across all speed and agility assessments (p < 0.001).
conclusionsIn simple sprint and single change-of-direction tasks, both ankle bracing and taping led to faster performance, with improvements observed both immediately and over a six-week period. However, in complex directional-change agility tasks such as the ITN mobility test, ankle bracing resulted in slower performance. Athletes should weigh potential performance benefits against possible movement constraints, and the use of ankle supports should be individualized.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500107099, August 4, 2025, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.